SCHEMBL21882103

SCHEMBL21882103

CC(C)/N=N/c1ccc(S(C)(=O)=O)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ MAPT P10636 1/20 0.44
▸ ENPP2 Q13822 2/20 0.43
▸ LMNA P02545 1/20 0.38
▸ CA12 O43570 4/20 0.37
▸ CA2 P00918 4/20 0.37
▸ CA9 Q16790 4/20 0.37
▸ PTGS2 P35354 2/20 0.37
▸ POLB P06746 2/20 0.37
▸ CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.37
▸ MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.37
▸ NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.37
▸ RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.37
▸ KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.37
▸ CA7 P43166 1/20 0.36
▸ G6PD P11413 1/20 0.35
▸ IDE P14735 1/20 0.35
▸ SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL19844938 0.78 MAPT (0.46) MAPTLMNACA12CA2CA9
SCHEMBL19844935 0.74 THRB (0.37) MAPTLMNAPTGS2POLBCYP2D6
SCHEMBL19844939 0.74 ALDH1A1 (0.43) MAPTCA2RAB9ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL5355231 0.73 ENPP2 (0.75) MAPTENPP2LMNACA12CA2
SCHEMBL5355235 0.73 ENPP2 (0.75) MAPTENPP2LMNACA12CA2
SCHEMBL2376239 0.72 ENPP2 (0.72) ENPP2PTGS2
SCHEMBL7056902 0.72 ENPP2 (0.52) MAPTENPP2CA12CA2CA9
SCHEMBL13074567 0.72 NPC1 (0.43) MAPTLMNAPOLBCYP2D6MEN1
SCHEMBL5316865 0.72 ENPP2 (0.52) MAPTENPP2PTGS2SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL14419936 0.71 NPC1 (0.71) MAPTCA12CA2CA9PTGS2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11155568-B2 Bioadhesives NUTECH VENTURES (US) 2021-10-26 — — US disclosed
US-20200095270-A1 METHODS OF MAKING AND USING LIGNIN DERIVATIVES NUTECH VENTURES 2020-03-26 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-11155568-B2 Bioadhesives EPCAM, VCAM1, SELP MAPT 1598/4885ENPP2 3055/4885LMNA 941/4885
US-20200095270-A1 METHODS OF MAKING AND USING LIGNIN DERIVATIVES HLCS, LOX, DCXR MAPT 1550/4885ENPP2 4006/4885LMNA 373/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback