Lithium Ion

Lithium Ion

SCHEMBL2890318

C=CS(=O)(=O)c1cccc(N2C(=O)c3c(S(=O)(=O)[O-])c(N)c4cc(S(=O)(=O)[O-])ccc4c3C2=O)c1.[Li+].[Li+]

nearest known ligand 0.40

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

GSK3AGSK3BIMPA1

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Lithium Ion. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ CA1 P00915 5/20 0.40
▸ CA2 P00918 5/20 0.40
▸ CA7 P43166 2/20 0.40
▸ CA12 O43570 3/20 0.39
▸ CA9 Q16790 3/20 0.39
▸ CASP3 P42574 1/20 0.32
▸ CFTR P13569 2/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Lithium Ion SCHEMBL95351 0.75 CLTC (0.44) CA1CA2CA7CA12CA9
Lithium Ion SCHEMBL29875131 0.75 CLTC (0.44) CA1CA2CA7CA12CA9
SCHEMBL1443489 0.73 CA1 (0.40) CA1CA2CA7CA12CA9
SCHEMBL31305335 0.67 CA1 (0.50) CA1CA2CA7CA12CA9
Lithium Ion SCHEMBL16937435 0.67 STK10 (0.33) —
SCHEMBL28451650 0.66 KMT2A (0.37) CA1CA2CA7CA12CA9
SCHEMBL28898006 0.65 KMT2A (0.36) CA1CA2CA7CA12CA9
SCHEMBL13870630 0.65 KMT2A (0.39) CA1CA2CA7CA12CA9
SCHEMBL54845 0.61 TSHR (0.50) CA1CA2CA12CA9
SCHEMBL1376919 0.60 ALDH1A1 (0.62) CA1CA2CA12CA9

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2189503-A1 NOVEL NUCLEIC ACID DERIVATIVE INTO WHICH GIVEN COMPOUND HAS BEEN INTRODUCED AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME Biodynamics Laboratory, INC. (JP) 2010-05-26 — — EP disclosed
US-20090090628-A1 NUCLEIC ACID DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE BIODYNAMICS LABORATORY, INC (JP) 2009-04-09 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090090628-A1 NUCLEIC ACID DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE NSUN3, TRDMT1, NSUN2 CA1 2759/4885CA2 3497/4885CA7 1541/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback