SCHEMBL3193765

SCHEMBL3193765

CC(C)C[C@H](NC(=O)Cn1ccc2cc(NS(=O)(=O)c3ccc(C(C)(C)C)cc3)ccc21)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.82

Predicted protein targets (top 1)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NTSR1 P30989 16/20 0.70

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3201141 0.89 NTSR1 (0.75) NTSR1
SCHEMBL3328211 0.88 NTSR1 (0.59) NTSR1
SCHEMBL3193084 0.88 NTSR1 (0.59) NTSR1
SCHEMBL3202701 0.86 NTSR1 (0.64) NTSR1
SCHEMBL3185394 0.80 NTSR1 (1.00) NTSR1
SCHEMBL3194968 0.78 NTSR1 (0.60) NTSR1
SCHEMBL3204698 0.76 NR1I2 (0.53) NTSR1
SCHEMBL3185508 0.75 EPHX2 (0.62)
SCHEMBL3196554 0.75 ALDH1A1 (0.43) NTSR1
SCHEMBL3206680 0.74 NTSR1 (0.53) NTSR1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100137363-A1 Substituted Indoles And Methods Of Their Use WYETH LLC (US) 2010-06-03 US claimed
EP-1919866-A2 SUBSTITUTED INDOLES AND USE THEREOF Wyeth a Corporation of the State of Delaware (US) 2008-05-14 EP claimed
US-20070043101-A1 Substituted indoles and methods of their use WYETH (US) 2007-02-22 US claimed
WO-2007022321-A2 SUBSTITUTED INDOLES AND USE THEREOF WYETH (US) 2007-02-22 WO claimed
US-20100137363-A1 Substituted Indoles And Methods Of Their Use WYETH LLC (US) 2010-06-03 US disclosed
US-7683091-B2 Substituted indoles and methods of their use WYETH (US) 2010-03-23 US disclosed
US-20070043101-A1 Substituted indoles and methods of their use WYETH (US) 2007-02-22 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070043101-A1 Substituted indoles and methods of their use INMT, AANAT, IDO2 NTSR1 411/4885
US-20100137363-A1 Substituted Indoles And Methods Of Their Use INMT, AANAT, IDO2 NTSR1 411/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.