SCHEMBL3197540

SCHEMBL3197540

O=C(CCOc1ccccc1)C1CC2C=CC1C2

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.45
RAB9A P51151 4/20 0.44
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.44
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.44
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.43
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.43
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.43
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.43
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.41
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.41
ESR1 P03372 1/20 0.41
PKM P14618 1/20 0.41
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.41
NPC1 O15118 3/20 0.40
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.40
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.40
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.39
FFAR1 O14842 1/20 0.39
HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.39
HDAC2 Q92769 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4398753 0.83 ALDH1A1 (0.57) KDM4ERAB9AALDH1A1KMT2ATSHR
SCHEMBL14449133 0.83 ALDH1A1 (0.57) KDM4ERAB9AALDH1A1KMT2ATSHR
SCHEMBL201849 0.76 ALDH1A1 (0.51) KDM4ERAB9AALDH1A1KMT2ATSHR
SCHEMBL19666689 0.75 L3MBTL1 (0.50) RAB9ACYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C9CYP2C19
SCHEMBL18560860 0.73 KDM4E (0.48) KDM4EALDH1A1KMT2ACYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL8852595 0.72 LMNA (0.47) KDM4ERAB9AALDH1A1KMT2ATSHR
SCHEMBL13346338 0.72 KDM4E (0.50) KDM4ERAB9AALDH1A1KMT2ATSHR
SCHEMBL13702220 0.71 ALDH1A1 (0.59) KDM4ERAB9AALDH1A1KMT2ATSHR
SCHEMBL14581091 0.70 KDM4E (0.62) KDM4ERAB9AALDH1A1KMT2ARECQL
SCHEMBL21895667 0.70 ALDH1A1 (0.68) KDM4ERAB9AALDH1A1KMT2ACYP3A4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7675587-B2 Polarizing plate and process for producing the same JSR CORPORATION (JP) 2010-03-09 US disclosed
US-20090176950-A1 METAL HYDRIDE COMPLEX, METHOD OF HYDROGENATING RING-OPENING POLYMERIZATION POLYMER OF CYCLOOLEFIN, AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING PRODUCT OF HYDROGENATION OF RING-OPENING POLYMERIZATION POLYMER OF CYCLOOLEFIN JSR CORPORATION (JP) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
EP-1983023-A1 Radiation-curable composition, composite and manufacturing method thereof JSR Corporation (JP) 2008-10-22 EP disclosed
EP-1626294-A2 Polarizing plate and process for producing the same JSR Corporation (JP) 2006-02-15 EP disclosed
US-20060027322-A1 Polarizing plate and process for producing the same JSR CORPORATION (JP) 2006-02-09 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090176950-A1 METAL HYDRIDE COMPLEX, METHOD OF HYDROGENATING RING-OPENING POLYMERIZATION POLYMER OF CYCLOOLEFIN, AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING PRODUCT OF HYDROGENATION OF RING-OPENING POLYMERIZATION POLYMER OF CYCLOOLEFIN HPD, HMOX2, HAO2 KDM4E 4477/4885RAB9A 4640/4885ALDH1A1 2201/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.