SCHEMBL3241447

SCHEMBL3241447

NC(=O)c1ccccc1-c1cc(Cl)cc(Cl)c1

nearest known ligand 0.63

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ BCAT2 O15382 1/20 0.63
▸ CTSA P10619 1/20 0.49
▸ RORB Q92753 2/20 0.49
▸ KEAP1 Q14145 1/20 0.47
▸ NFE2L2 Q16236 1/20 0.47
▸ PDK2 Q15119 1/20 0.47
▸ CHEK1 O14757 1/20 0.47
▸ CASP1 P29466 2/20 0.46
▸ IKBKB O14920 1/20 0.46
▸ KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.45
▸ MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.44
▸ RORC P51449 1/20 0.44
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.44
▸ MAPT P10636 1/20 0.44
▸ HPGD P15428 1/20 0.44
▸ TSHR P16473 1/20 0.44
▸ HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.44
▸ SLC6A4 P31645 1/20 0.44
▸ SLC6A3 Q01959 1/20 0.44
▸ NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL27926363 0.86 BCAT2 (0.76) BCAT2KEAP1NFE2L2CHEK1CASP1
SCHEMBL3632126 0.86 BCAT2 (0.65) BCAT2RORBCHEK1CASP1IKBKB
SCHEMBL411720 0.83 HNF4A (0.52) BCAT2RORBKDM4EALDH1A1MAPT
SCHEMBL197002 0.83 BCAT2 (0.71) BCAT2CHEK1CASP1IKBKBKDM4E
SCHEMBL28270443 0.81 BCAT2 (0.69) BCAT2CHEK1CASP1IKBKBKDM4E
SCHEMBL27843687 0.81 BCAT2 (0.81) BCAT2KEAP1NFE2L2CHEK1CASP1
SCHEMBL5878337 0.80 BCAT2 (0.87) BCAT2KEAP1NFE2L2CHEK1IKBKB
SCHEMBL3234101 0.79 BCAT2 (0.59) BCAT2RORBPDK2CHEK1CASP1
SCHEMBL10908563 0.79 BCAT2 (0.77) BCAT2CTSAKEAP1NFE2L2CHEK1
SCHEMBL5273765 0.78 CASP1 (0.59) BCAT2PDK2CHEK1CASP1ALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 24 patents — showing the first 20. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20090011935-A1 Method of Inducing Tolerance of Plants Against Bacterioses BASF SE (DE) 2009-01-08 — — US claimed
EP-1996018-A2 METHOD OF INDUCING TOLERANCE OF PLANTS AGAINST BACTERIOSES BASF SE (DE) 2008-12-03 — — EP claimed
WO-2007104658-A2 METHOD OF INDUCING TOLERANCE OF PLANTS AGAINST BACTERIOSES BASF SE (DE) 2007-09-20 — — WO claimed
EP-2259675-B1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING 3'-BROMINE-2,3,4,6'-TETRAMETHOXY-2'-6-DIMETHYLBENZOPHENONE BASF SE (DE) 2015-10-07 — — EP disclosed
EP-2392662-A2 Plant produtivity enhancement by combining chemical agents with transgenic modifications BASF SE (DE) 2011-12-07 — — EP disclosed
EP-2259675-A2 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING 3'-BROMINE-2,3,4,6'-TETRAMETHOXY-2'-6-DIMETHYLBENZOPHENONE BASF SE (DE) 2010-12-15 — — EP disclosed
US-20100093715-A1 Plant productivity enhancement by combining chemical agents with transgenic modifications BASF SE (DE) 2010-04-15 — — US disclosed
WO-2010015634-A1 METHOD FOR SCREENING FOR A PLANT PROTECTANT BASF SE (DE) 2010-02-11 — — WO disclosed
EP-2150106-A2 ACTIVE INGREDIENT COMPOSITIONS FOR PLANT PROTECTION BASF SE (DE) 2010-02-10 — — EP disclosed
WO-2010010005-A2 OIL-IN-WATER EMULSION COMPRISING SOLVENT, WATER, SURFACTANT AND PESTICIDE BASF SE (DE) 2010-01-28 — — WO disclosed
EP-2142293-A2 ENZYMATIC METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF MICROCAPSULES BASF SE (DE) 2010-01-13 — — EP disclosed
EP-2076602-A2 PLANT PRODUTIVITY ENHANCEMENT BY COMBINING CHEMICAL AGENTS WITH TRANSGENIC MODIFICATIONS BASF SE (DE) 2009-07-08 — — EP disclosed
US-20090011935-A1 Method of Inducing Tolerance of Plants Against Bacterioses BASF SE (DE) 2009-01-08 — — US disclosed
EP-1996018-A2 METHOD OF INDUCING TOLERANCE OF PLANTS AGAINST BACTERIOSES BASF SE (DE) 2008-12-03 — — EP disclosed
WO-2008132179-A2 ACTIVE INGREDIENT COMPOSITIONS FOR PLANT PROTECTION BASF SE (DE) 2008-11-06 — — WO disclosed
WO-2008132067-A2 ENZYMATIC METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF MICROCAPSULES BASF SE (DE) 2008-11-06 — — WO disclosed
WO-2008129060-A2 PLANT PRODUTIVITY ENHANCEMENT BY COMBINING CHEMICAL AGENTS WITH TRANSGENIC MODIFICATIONS BASF SE (DE) 2008-10-30 — — WO disclosed
WO-2007104658-A2 METHOD OF INDUCING TOLERANCE OF PLANTS AGAINST BACTERIOSES BASF SE (DE) 2007-09-20 — — WO disclosed
EP-1453828-A2 AZABICYCLIC COMPOUNDS FOR THE TREATMENT OF FIBROMYALGIA SYNDROME AstraZeneca AB (SE) 2004-09-08 — — EP disclosed
WO-2003032897-A2 AZABICYCLIC COMPOUNDS FOR THE TREATMENT OF FIBROMYALGIA SYNDROME ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2003-04-24 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090011935-A1 Method of Inducing Tolerance of Plants Against Bacterioses BROX, CAT, SLC11A2 BCAT2 142/4885CTSA 1543/4885RORB 1856/4885
US-20100093715-A1 Plant productivity enhancement by combining chemical agents with transgenic modifications CBR3, MYB, HACL2 BCAT2 716/4885CTSA 4206/4885RORB 2782/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback