Predicted protein targets (top 14)
| gene | UniProt | supporting neighbours | confidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | ENPP2 | Q13822 | 1/20 | 0.39 |
| ▸ | RXRB | P28702 | 1/20 | 0.37 |
| ▸ | KDM4E | B2RXH2 | 1/20 | 0.37 |
| ▸ | TDP1 | Q9NUW8 | 1/20 | 0.37 |
| ▸ | TSHR | P16473 | 2/20 | 0.37 |
| ▸ | MMP3 | P08254 | 1/20 | 0.37 |
| ▸ | SMN1; SMN2 | Q16637 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | CETP | P11597 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | MAPK8 | P45983 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | ADRA2A | P08913 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | ADRA2B | P18089 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | ADRA2C | P18825 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | ALOX15 | P16050 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | HSD17B10 | Q99714 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.
Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules
Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.
| Compound | similarity | top predicted | shared targets | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEMBL1466419 | 0.98 | RXRB (0.40) | ENPP2RXRBKDM4ETDP1TSHR | |
| SCHEMBL17656375 | 0.82 | ESR2 (0.37) | ENPP2KDM4ETDP1MMP3 | |
| SCHEMBL21218921 | 0.81 | ENPP2 (0.40) | ENPP2KDM4ETDP1TSHRMMP3 | |
| SCHEMBL26526120 | 0.80 | MEN1 (0.53) | RXRBTSHRCETPMAPK8ADRA2A | |
| SCHEMBL1790247 | 0.79 | HRH3 (0.51) | — | |
| SCHEMBL28840767 | 0.78 | PRMT5 (0.38) | ENPP2KDM4ETDP1TSHRMMP3 | |
| SCHEMBL1789393 | 0.77 | NPC1 (0.40) | RXRBKDM4ETSHRALOX15HSD17B10 | |
| SCHEMBL4133761 | 0.77 | CTNNB1 (0.43) | — | |
| SCHEMBL4133763 | 0.77 | KCNH2 (0.46) | — | |
| SCHEMBL29790987 | 0.77 | KCNH2 (0.46) | — |
Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.
Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them
Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.
| Patent | Title | Assignee | Published | Priority | Filing | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US-20090054460-A1 | Piperazine derivatives and methods of use | CHEN JIAN J | 2009-02-26 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-7393852-B2 | Piperazine derivatives and methods of use | AMGEN INC. (US) | 2008-07-01 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| EP-1656355-B1 | PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE | AMGEN INC (US) | 2008-03-12 | — | — | EP | disclosed |
| EP-1878728-A2 | Derivatives of piperazine and higher homologues thereof for the treatment of inflammation-related disorders | Amgen Inc. (US) | 2008-01-16 | — | — | EP | disclosed |
| EP-1656355-A2 | PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE | AMGEN INC. (US) | 2006-05-17 | — | — | EP | disclosed |
| WO-2005061467-A2 | PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AS BRADYKININ ANTAGONISTS | AMGEN INC. (US) | 2005-07-07 | — | — | WO | disclosed |
| US-20050014749-A1 | analgesics; antiinflammatory agents; antiarthritic agents;Alzheimer's disease; cirrhosis; antiallergens; antihistamines ; anticancer agents; vision defects | AMGEN INC. | 2005-01-20 | — | — | US | disclosed |
Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?
For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.
| Patent | Title | Text reads most about | Predicted target · text-rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| US-20090054460-A1 | Piperazine derivatives and methods of use | PTGES, PTGES2, PTGIS | ENPP2 260/4885RXRB 1413/4885KDM4E 2594/4885 |
| US-20050014749-A1 | analgesics; antiinflammatory agents; antiarthritic agents;Alzheimer's disease; cirrhosis; antiallergens; antihistamines ; anticancer agents; vision defects | ACHE, TNF, BCHE | ENPP2 223/4885RXRB 2477/4885KDM4E 3048/4885 |
“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.