SCHEMBL4565953

SCHEMBL4565953

CCCCCC=Cc1cc(C(C)(C)C)c(O)c(C(C)(C)C)c1

nearest known ligand 0.50

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GABBR2 O75899 2/20 0.50
GABBR1 Q9UBS5 2/20 0.50
PTGS1 P23219 4/20 0.49
PTGS2 P35354 4/20 0.49
HTT P42858 1/20 0.45
ALOX5 P09917 2/20 0.44
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.43
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.43
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.41
RGS12 O14924 1/20 0.41
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.41
GMNN O75496 1/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.41
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.41
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.41
GLA P06280 1/20 0.41
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.41
GAA P10253 1/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.41
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4565952 1.00 GABBR2 (0.50) GABBR2GABBR1PTGS1PTGS2HTT
SCHEMBL1164681 0.83 TNNC1 (0.44) PTGS1PTGS2HTTCYP2C9ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL1164679 0.83 TNNC1 (0.44) PTGS1PTGS2HTTCYP2C9ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6071609 0.82 HTT (0.46) GABBR2GABBR1PTGS1PTGS2HTT
SCHEMBL15299843 0.82 HTT (0.46) GABBR2GABBR1PTGS1PTGS2HTT
SCHEMBL8072537 0.81 GABBR2 (0.58) GABBR2GABBR1PTGS1PTGS2HTT
SCHEMBL8072535 0.81 GABBR2 (0.58) GABBR2GABBR1PTGS1PTGS2HTT
SCHEMBL27447066 0.80 GABBR2 (0.54) GABBR2GABBR1PTGS1PTGS2HTT
SCHEMBL2189364 0.78 HTT (0.49) GABBR2GABBR1PTGS1PTGS2HTT
SCHEMBL10296725 0.78 LCK (0.48) PTGS2ALOX5CYP3A4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20130005718-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF TREATING CHRONIC PAIN BY ADMINISTERING PROPOFOL DERIVATIVES THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK 2013-01-03 US disclosed
US-7479507-B2 Anti-inflammatory substituted phenols and elastomeric compositions for oral delivery of drugs HELLER ADAM 2009-01-20 US disclosed
US-20060258618-A1 Anti-inflammatory substituted phenols and elastomeric compositions for oral delivery of drugs HELLER ADAM 2006-11-16 US disclosed
WO-2004064781-A2 ANTI-INFLAMMATORY SUBSTITUTED PHENOLS AND ELASTOMERIC COMPOSITIONS FOR ORAL DELIVERY OF DRUGS HELLER ADAM (US) 2004-08-05 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060258618-A1 Anti-inflammatory substituted phenols and elastomeric compositions for oral delivery of drugs PTGES3, PTGES, HPGDS GABBR2 4258/4885GABBR1 4233/4885PTGS1 6/4885
US-20130005718-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF TREATING CHRONIC PAIN BY ADMINISTERING PROPOFOL DERIVATIVES HCN3, HCN1, HCN2 GABBR2 221/4885GABBR1 218/4885PTGS1 227/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.