SCHEMBL625364

SCHEMBL625364

Oc1nc2ccccc2c(O)c1-c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 6/20 0.46
DHODH Q02127 2/20 0.46
PDE10A Q9Y233 2/20 0.46
ESR1 P03372 4/20 0.46
ESR2 Q92731 4/20 0.46
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 5/20 0.44
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.43
GAA P10253 1/20 0.42
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.42
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.41
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.41
KDM4E B2RXH2 4/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.41
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.41
HSD17B10 Q99714 2/20 0.41
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.41
POLB P06746 1/20 0.41
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.41
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.41
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL624087 0.98 LMNA (0.45) LMNADHODHPDE10AESR1ESR2
SCHEMBL2717330 0.79 DHODH (0.51) DHODHMAPTKMT2AMEN1KDM4E
SCHEMBL15648140 0.79 RXFP1 (0.52) DHODHMAPTKMT2AMEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL311283 0.79 KDM4E (0.44) LMNADHODHPDE10ASMN1; SMN2MAPT
SCHEMBL851828 0.79 KDM4E (0.44) LMNADHODHPDE10ASMN1; SMN2MAPT
SCHEMBL3743372 0.78 LMNA (0.71) LMNADHODHPDE10ASMN1; SMN2MAPT
SCHEMBL4060310 0.77 KDM4E (0.43) LMNADHODHPDE10ASMN1; SMN2MAPT
SCHEMBL27797272 0.77 KDM4E (0.43) LMNADHODHPDE10ASMN1; SMN2MAPT
SCHEMBL7761646 0.77 ENPP1 (0.51) LMNADHODHPDE10AESR1ESR2
SCHEMBL29636195 0.77 ERN1 (0.47) LMNADHODHPDE10AESR1ESR2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9199924-B2 Process for the preparation of urethanes BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH (DE) 2015-12-01 US disclosed
EP-2603319-B1 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF URETHANS BAYER IP GMBH (DE) 2014-10-22 EP disclosed
US-20130303740-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING URETHANES BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH (DE) 2013-11-14 US disclosed
EP-2603319-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING URETHANES Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH (DE) 2013-06-19 EP disclosed
WO-2012020028-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING URETHANES BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE AG (DE) 2012-02-16 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130303740-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING URETHANES SOD1, AOC2, DUOX2 LMNA 1462/4885DHODH 1942/4885PDE10A 4050/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.