SCHEMBL6434696

SCHEMBL6434696

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)CN(Cc1ccccc1)Cc1ccc2c(Cl)cnc(Cl)c2c1

nearest known ligand 0.43

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NR1D1 P20393 5/20 0.43
NR1H3 Q13133 1/20 0.43
PLAU P00749 2/20 0.38
PPARG P37231 1/20 0.37
AKT1 P31749 2/20 0.37
MEP1A Q16819 1/20 0.35
MEP1B Q16820 1/20 0.35
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.35
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.35
TRPM8 Q7Z2W7 1/20 0.35
CTSL P07711 1/20 0.34
CTSB P07858 1/20 0.34
CTSS P25774 1/20 0.34
ABCB1 P08183 1/20 0.34
CCNT1 O60563 1/20 0.34
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6434091 0.85 NR1D1 (0.38) NR1D1NR1H3PLAUPPARGAKT1
SCHEMBL6433018 0.83 CFTR (0.38) PLAUMEN1KMT2ATRPM8CTSL
SCHEMBL6434223 0.82 RXRA (0.32) NR1D1NR1H3PLAUCCNT1
SCHEMBL6433131 0.82 PLAU (0.58) NR1D1PLAUTRPM8CTSLCTSS
SCHEMBL6434228 0.77 OPRM1 (0.36) PLAUKMT2ATRPM8
SCHEMBL782348 0.77 AKT1 (0.55) NR1D1NR1H3AKT1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL6433655 0.77 ALDH1A1 (0.40) PLAUMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL6433766 0.76 PLAU (0.51) NR1D1PLAUCTSLCTSS
SCHEMBL6433083 0.75 PLAU (0.57) PLAUMEN1KMT2ATRPM8L3MBTL1
SCHEMBL23130693 0.75 AKT1 (0.50) NR1D1NR1H3AKT1MEN1KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 NR1D1 3397/4885NR1H3 3962/4885PLAU 119/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 NR1D1 3397/4885NR1H3 3962/4885PLAU 119/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.