SCHEMBL6434223

SCHEMBL6434223

Cc1ccccc1N(CC(=O)OC(C)(C)C)Cc1ccc2c(Cl)cnc(Cl)c2c1

nearest known ligand 0.32

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
RXRA P19793 1/20 0.32
RXRB P28702 1/20 0.32
GPBAR1 Q8TDU6 2/20 0.32
PLAU P00749 2/20 0.31
NR1D1 P20393 1/20 0.31
NR1H3 Q13133 1/20 0.31
HSD17B1 P14061 2/20 0.31
HSD17B2 P37059 2/20 0.31
CCNT1 O60563 1/20 0.31
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.30
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6437521 0.86 BCL2L1 (0.32) PLAUCCNT1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6960291 0.85 BCL2L1 (0.32) PLAUCCNT1
SCHEMBL7389837 0.84 ALDH1A1 (0.35) RXRARXRBGPBAR1KDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6434696 0.82 NR1D1 (0.43) PLAUNR1D1NR1H3CCNT1
SCHEMBL6434727 0.75 PLAU (0.45) PLAUNR1D1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL7378316 0.74 GRM2 (0.30)
SCHEMBL6433018 0.74 CFTR (0.38) PLAUALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6433131 0.73 PLAU (0.58) PLAUNR1D1KDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6434228 0.72 OPRM1 (0.36) PLAUKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6434229 0.72 PLAU (0.54) PLAUALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 RXRA 2691/4885RXRB 2103/4885GPBAR1 2420/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 RXRA 2691/4885RXRB 2103/4885GPBAR1 2420/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.