Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid

Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid

SCHEMBL7086264

CN(C)c1cccc([O-])c1.O=S(=O)([O-])C(F)(F)F.O=S(=O)([O-])C(F)(F)F.[Al+3]

nearest known ligand 0.40

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GPR3 P46089 2/20 0.40
CA12 O43570 2/20 0.39
CA2 P00918 2/20 0.39
CA9 Q16790 2/20 0.39
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.39
CA4 P22748 1/20 0.39
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.38
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.38
PTGS1 P23219 1/20 0.38
PTGS2 P35354 1/20 0.38
NSD2 O96028 1/20 0.37
NR2F2 P24468 1/20 0.37
KCNH2 Q12809 6/20 0.35
ACHE P22303 4/20 0.35
HSP90AA1 P07900 1/20 0.35
CFTR P13569 1/20 0.35
NQO2 P16083 1/20 0.35
GOPC Q9HD26 1/20 0.35
GBA1 P04062 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL7086263 0.89 ALDH1A1 (0.41) CA12CA2CA9CA1CA4
SCHEMBL9091839 0.78 ALDH1A1 (0.52) CA12CA2CA9CA1CA4
Potassium Ion SCHEMBL527016 0.78 ALDH1A1 (0.52) CA12CA2CA9CA1CA4
Lithium Ion SCHEMBL3293326 0.78 ALDH1A1 (0.52) CA12CA2CA9CA1CA4
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL7089027 0.78 GPR3 (0.43) GPR3KCNH2ACHE
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL7089263 0.76 GPR3 (0.44) GPR3CA12CA2CA9CA1
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL7089713 0.75 ACHE (0.42) GPR3ALDH1A1KCNH2ACHE
1-Hydroxy-3-Methoxybenzene SCHEMBL7085847 0.74 KCNH2 (0.49) GPR3CA12CA2CA9CA1
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL7092453 0.74 L3MBTL1 (0.41) GPR3ALDH1A1TSHRPTGS2KCNH2
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL6560666 0.73 GPR3 (0.57) GPR3CA2CA9CA1ALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-6624321-B2 Metathesis ring-opening polymerization of cyclic ethers in the presence of catalysts such as aluminum bis(trifluoromethane-sulfonate) phenolate BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2003-09-23 US disclosed
US-20030097026-A1 Process for the preparation of polyether polyols DENNINGER UWE (DE) 2003-05-22 US disclosed
US-6492565-B2 USING ALKYLENE OXIDE IN PRESENCE OF LEWIS ACID CATALYST BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2002-12-10 US disclosed
US-20010053866-A1 Process for the preparation of polyether polyols BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2001-12-20 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030097026-A1 Process for the preparation of polyether polyols PCBP1, FHIT, PUF60 GPR3 3548/4885CA12 313/4885CA2 1508/4885
US-20010053866-A1 Process for the preparation of polyether polyols PCBP1, FHIT, PUF60 GPR3 3548/4885CA12 313/4885CA2 1508/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.