SCHEMBL7564474

SCHEMBL7564474

CC(=O)Cn1c(=O)c2c(ncn2Cc2ccccc2)n(C)c1=O

nearest known ligand 0.73

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
POLB P06746 1/20 0.73
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.73
ADORA2B P29275 3/20 0.70
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.70
RXFP1 Q9HBX9 1/20 0.70
TRPA1 O75762 3/20 0.67
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.61
PDE1A P54750 1/20 0.60
PDE1B Q01064 1/20 0.60
PDE1C Q14123 1/20 0.60
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.58
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.58
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.58
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.58
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.58
GLA P06280 1/20 0.56
HTT P42858 1/20 0.56
UBE2N P61088 1/20 0.56
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.56
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.55

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL11014928 0.88 POLB (0.83) POLBHIF1AADORA2BSMN1; SMN2RXFP1
SCHEMBL7558655 0.88 POLB (0.72) POLBHIF1AADORA2BSMN1; SMN2RXFP1
SCHEMBL7558870 0.87 LMNA (0.71) POLBHIF1AADORA2BSMN1; SMN2RXFP1
SCHEMBL7565001 0.83 POLB (0.71) POLBHIF1AADORA2BSMN1; SMN2RXFP1
SCHEMBL1944405 0.82 ADORA2B (1.00) POLBHIF1AADORA2BSMN1; SMN2RXFP1
SCHEMBL7603292 0.82 POLB (0.74) POLBHIF1AADORA2BSMN1; SMN2RXFP1
SCHEMBL3116289 0.82 POLB (0.86) POLBHIF1AADORA2BSMN1; SMN2RXFP1
SCHEMBL7559268 0.82 POLB (0.73) POLBHIF1AADORA2BSMN1; SMN2RXFP1
SCHEMBL7803097 0.82 TRPA1 (0.75) ADORA2BRXFP1TRPA1MAPK1LMNA
SCHEMBL5718879 0.81 POLB (0.65) POLBHIF1AADORA2BSMN1; SMN2RXFP1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20020010333-A1 Use of xanthine derivatives for reducing the pathological hyperreactivity of eosinophilic granulocytes, novel xanthine compounds and process for their preparation HOECHST AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT 2002-01-24 US disclosed
EP-0758239-A1 USE OF XANTHINE DERIVATIVES FOR REDUCING THE PATHOLOGICAL HYPER-REACTIVITY OF EOSINOPHILIC GRANULOCYTES, NOVEL XANTHINE COMPOUNDS AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING THEM HOECHST AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 1997-02-19 EP disclosed
WO-1995026727-A1 USE OF XANTHINE DERIVATIVES FOR REDUCING THE PATHOLOGICAL HYPER-REACTIVITY OF EOSINOPHILIC GRANULOCYTES, NOVEL XANTHINE COMPOUNDS AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING THEM HOECHST AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 1995-10-12 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020010333-A1 Use of xanthine derivatives for reducing the pathological hyperreactivity of eosinophilic granulocytes, novel xanthine compounds and process for their preparation EPX, XDH, MPO POLB 2681/4885HIF1A 2305/4885ADORA2B 163/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.