SCHEMBL7932241

SCHEMBL7932241

CN(C1CCCCC1)S(=O)(=O)c1ccccc1NC(=O)CS

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 5/20 0.51
KDM4E B2RXH2 4/20 0.49
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.49
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.49
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.49
HSD17B10 Q99714 2/20 0.46
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.46
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.46
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 4/20 0.46
HTT P42858 3/20 0.46
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.46
MAPT P10636 5/20 0.45
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.44
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.43
GPR55 Q9Y2T6 1/20 0.42
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.42
ABCC1 P33527 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL30926959 0.78 LMNA (0.61) LMNAKDM4EALDH1A1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL27180907 0.78 LMNA (0.61) LMNAKDM4EALDH1A1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL7923968 0.76 ALDH1A1 (0.61) LMNAKDM4EALDH1A1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL7931470 0.72 LMNA (0.49) LMNAKDM4EALDH1A1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL1143286 0.71 ALDH1A1 (0.62) LMNAKDM4EALDH1A1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL7933999 0.70 CA1 (0.73)
SCHEMBL12197903 0.69 GRM4 (0.59) LMNAKDM4EALDH1A1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL1340375 0.68 LMNA (0.55) LMNATP53
SCHEMBL7934941 0.68 HTR6 (0.54) HTT
SCHEMBL4159760 0.67 ALDH1A1 (1.00) LMNAKDM4EALDH1A1MEN1KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110190285-A1 METHODS OF TREATING A BOTULINUM TOXIN RELATED CONDITION IN A SUBJECT ABSOLUTE SCIENCE, INC. (US) 2011-08-04 US disclosed
US-20110034521-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR TREATING ZINC MATRIX METALLOPROTEASE DEPENDENT DISEASES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT 2011-02-10 US disclosed
WO-2010033360-A1 METHODS OF TREATING A BOTULINUM TOXIN RELATED CONDITION IN A SUBJECT 1/3 ABSOLUTE SCIENCE, INC. (US) 2010-03-25 WO disclosed
WO-2009045761-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR TREATING ZINC MATRIX METALLOPROTEASE DEPENDENT DISEASES ABSOLUTE SCIENCE, INC. (US) 2009-04-09 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110034521-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR TREATING ZINC MATRIX METALLOPROTEASE DEPENDENT DISEASES MMP7, MMP3, MMP9 LMNA 1805/4885KDM4E 1274/4885ALDH1A1 496/4885
US-20110190285-A1 METHODS OF TREATING A BOTULINUM TOXIN RELATED CONDITION IN A SUBJECT NPY5R, RAC3, CPA3 LMNA 1069/4885KDM4E 1963/4885ALDH1A1 2213/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.