SCHEMBL10313409

SCHEMBL10313409

Oc1ccccc1Nc1ccc(Cl)cc1Cl

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.53
HSP90AA1 P07900 1/20 0.49
NPC1 O15118 4/20 0.48
RAB9A P51151 4/20 0.48
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.48
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.48
GAA P10253 2/20 0.48
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.48
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.48
CCR6 P51684 1/20 0.48
CXCR2 P25025 3/20 0.48
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.47
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.47
ADORA1 P30542 1/20 0.47
HTT P42858 1/20 0.46
GRIK1 P39086 1/20 0.45
KCNMA1 Q12791 2/20 0.45
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.45
ALOX5 P09917 1/20 0.43
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL11091688 0.85 CXCR2 (0.57) NPC1RAB9AMEN1KMT2AGAA
SCHEMBL27967987 0.82 ALDH1A1 (0.54) ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9AMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL27968138 0.81 CXCR2 (0.54) ALDH1A1HSP90AA1MAPTMAPK1CXCR2
SCHEMBL5383722 0.78 KDM4E (0.54) ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9AMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL304891 0.77 CXCR2 (0.54) ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9AMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL24021599 0.76 LMNA (0.62) ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9AMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL16148164 0.76 RORC (0.60) ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9AMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL14514318 0.75 CXCR2 (0.52) ALDH1A1HSP90AA1NPC1RAB9AKMT2A
SCHEMBL1920752 0.75 CXCR2 (0.52) ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9AMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL9631014 0.75 ALDH1A1 (0.69) ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9AGAAMAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20120172292-A1 METHOD FOR PROTECTION OF ANTIMICROBIAL AND ANTICANCER DRUGS FROM INACTIVATION BY NITRIC OXIDE NEW YORK UNIVERSITY (US) 2012-07-05 US disclosed
US-20090291923-A1 TRIOXANE DIMERS HAVING HIGH ANTICANCER AND LONG-LASTING ANTIMALARIAL ACTIVITIES JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSOTY (US) 2009-11-26 US disclosed
US-20090291923-A1 TRIOXANE DIMERS HAVING HIGH ANTICANCER AND LONG-LASTING ANTIMALARIAL ACTIVITIES JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSOTY (US) 2009-11-26 US disclosed
WO-2007067333-A2 TRIOXANE DIMERS HAVING HIGH ANTICANCER AND LONG-LASTING ANTIMALARIAL ACTIVITIES JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY (US) 2007-06-14 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120172292-A1 METHOD FOR PROTECTION OF ANTIMICROBIAL AND ANTICANCER DRUGS FROM INACTIVATION BY NITRIC OXIDE NOS2, NOS1, NOS3 ALDH1A1 1004/4885HSP90AA1 254/4885NPC1 1033/4885
US-20090291923-A1 TRIOXANE DIMERS HAVING HIGH ANTICANCER AND LONG-LASTING ANTIMALARIAL ACTIVITIES HCCS, XPO5, DHX15 ALDH1A1 4123/4885HSP90AA1 3239/4885NPC1 2555/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.