Diethanolamine

Diethanolamine

SCHEMBL21629318

O=S(=O)(CC(F)(F)F)NS(=O)(=O)CC(F)(F)F.OCCNCCO

nearest known ligand 0.31

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

PTGIRfolP

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Diethanolamine. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CA3 P07451 2/20 0.31
CA5A P35218 2/20 0.31
CA5B Q9Y2D0 2/20 0.31
CA2 P00918 2/20 0.31
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.31
CA4 P22748 1/20 0.31
CA6 P23280 1/20 0.31
CA7 P43166 1/20 0.31
CA9 Q16790 1/20 0.31
CA14 Q9ULX7 1/20 0.31
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL244234 0.82 PGR (0.33) CA2CA9CA1
Monoethanolamine SCHEMBL21629309 0.81 ALDH1A1 (0.35)
SCHEMBL28569774 0.78 ATR (0.32)
Diethanolamine SCHEMBL29737132 0.74 CA1 (0.48) CA2CA1
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL1834681 0.73 CA2 (0.40) CA3CA5ACA5BCA2CA12
SCHEMBL10309464 0.73 PGR (0.33)
SCHEMBL25594038 0.71 PGR (0.32)
Diethanolamine SCHEMBL1022769 0.69 CA5A (0.40) CA5ACA5BCA2CA1
Diethanolamine SCHEMBL5874489 0.69 CA5A (0.40) CA5ACA5BCA2CA1
SCHEMBL6466187 0.69 CA1 (0.40) CA2CA1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20200030716-A1 TASK SPECIFIC CHELATING IONIC LIQUIDS FOR REMOVAL OF METAL IONS FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTION VIA LIQUID/LIQUID EXTRACTION AND ELECTROCHEMISTRY MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 2020-01-30 US claimed
US-20200030716-A1 TASK SPECIFIC CHELATING IONIC LIQUIDS FOR REMOVAL OF METAL IONS FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTION VIA LIQUID/LIQUID EXTRACTION AND ELECTROCHEMISTRY MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 2020-01-30 US disclosed
WO-2020023752-A1 TASK SPECIFIC CHELATING IONIC LIQUIDS FOR REMOVAL OF METAL IONS FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTION VIA LIQUID/LIQUID EXTRACTION AND ELECTROCHEMISTRY MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2020-01-30 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20200030716-A1 TASK SPECIFIC CHELATING IONIC LIQUIDS FOR REMOVAL OF METAL IONS FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTION VIA LIQUID/LIQUID EXTRACTION AND ELECTROCHEMISTRY SOD1, SOD3, SLC39A11 CA3 164/4885CA5A 2710/4885CA5B 2020/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.