SCHEMBL2804664

SCHEMBL2804664

O=C1NS(=O)(=O)c2c1ccc(Cl)c2Cl

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
RET P07949 2/20 0.44
GRK5 P34947 2/20 0.44
TYRO3 Q06418 2/20 0.44
DYRK1B Q9Y463 2/20 0.44
CHEK1 O14757 1/20 0.44
DAPK3 O43293 1/20 0.44
MAP4K4 O95819 1/20 0.44
PIM1 P11309 1/20 0.44
LTK P29376 1/20 0.44
CSNK1A1 P48729 1/20 0.44
CDK8 P49336 1/20 0.44
PRKX P51817 1/20 0.44
LIMK1 P53667 1/20 0.44
CDK5 Q00535 1/20 0.44
ACVR1 Q04771 1/20 0.44
PTK2 Q05397 1/20 0.44
PRKAA1 Q13131 1/20 0.44
DYRK1A Q13627 1/20 0.44
NTRK3 Q16288 1/20 0.44
LRRK2 Q5S007 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL29689422 0.81 RET (0.46) RETGRK5TYRO3DYRK1BCHEK1
SCHEMBL7386352 0.78 RET (0.39) RETGRK5TYRO3DYRK1BCHEK1
SCHEMBL2803756 0.77 RET (0.44) RETGRK5TYRO3DYRK1BCHEK1
SCHEMBL9179277 0.77 RET (0.53) RETGRK5TYRO3DYRK1BCHEK1
SCHEMBL29689272 0.67 CA12 (0.39) RETGRK5TYRO3DYRK1BCHEK1
SCHEMBL11850702 0.67 CA12 (0.47) RETGRK5TYRO3DYRK1BCHEK1
SCHEMBL5679607 0.67 CA12 (0.47) RETGRK5TYRO3DYRK1BCHEK1
SCHEMBL29689072 0.67 CA12 (0.39) RETGRK5TYRO3DYRK1BCHEK1
SCHEMBL4938757 0.67 CES1 (0.36) CES1AHR
SCHEMBL193750 0.65 CA12 (0.50) RETGRK5TYRO3DYRK1BCHEK1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 16 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2260050-B1 IMPROVED SUCRALOSE PURIFICATION PROCESS TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LTD (GB) 2014-09-17 EP disclosed
US-8497367-B2 Sucralose purification process TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED (GB) 2013-07-30 US disclosed
EP-2260049-B1 EFFECT OF CARBOHYDRATE CONCENTRATION ON SUCRALOSE EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LTD (GB) 2013-02-27 EP disclosed
US-8212022-B2 Effect of carbohydrate concentration on sucralose extraction efficiency TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED (GB) 2012-07-03 US disclosed
EP-2260049-A2 EFFECT OF CARBOHYDRATE CONCENTRATION ON SUCRALOSE EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY Tate & Lyle Technology Ltd (GB) 2010-12-15 EP disclosed
EP-2260050-A1 IMPROVED SUCRALOSE PURIFICATION PROCESS Tate & Lyle Technology Limited (GB) 2010-12-15 EP disclosed
US-20100081803-A1 EFFECT OF CARBOHYDRATE CONCENTRATION ON SUCRALOSE EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED (GB) 2010-04-01 US disclosed
US-20090299055-A1 Purification of Sucralose Containing Feed Streams for Sucralose Crystallization TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED (GB) 2009-12-03 US disclosed
US-20090299054-A1 SUCRALOSE PURIFICATION PROCESS TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED (GB) 2009-12-03 US disclosed
WO-2009146052-A2 CRYSTALLIZATION OF SUCRALOSE FROM SUCRALOSE-CONTAINING FEED STREAMS TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LTD (GB) 2009-12-03 WO disclosed
WO-2009137193-A2 EFFECT OF CARBOHYDRATE CONCENTRATION ON SUCRALOSE EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY TATE & LYTE TECHNOLOGY LTD (GB) 2009-11-12 WO disclosed
US-20090281295-A1 CRYSTALLIZATION OF SUCRALOSE FROM SUCRALOSE-CONTAINING FEED STREAMS TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED (GB) 2009-11-12 US disclosed
WO-2009137192-A2 PURIFICATION OF SUCRALOSE CONTAINING FEED STREAMS FOR SUCRALOSE CRYSTALLIZATION TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LTD (GB) 2009-11-12 WO disclosed
US-20090259036-A1 EXTRACTION OF LESS POLAR IMPURITIES FROM SUCRALOSE CONTAINING AQUEOUS FEED STREAMS TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED (GB) 2009-10-15 US disclosed
WO-2009124116-A1 IMPROVED SUCRALOSE PURIFICATION PROCESS TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LTD (GB) 2009-10-08 WO disclosed
WO-2009124113-A1 EXTRACTION OF LESS POLAR IMPURITIES FROM SUCRALOSE CONTAINING AQUEOUS FEED STREAMS TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LTD. (GB) 2009-10-08 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (4 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090299055-A1 Purification of Sucralose Containing Feed Streams for Sucralose Crystallization SORD, SI, GYS2 RET 2771/4885GRK5 4584/4885TYRO3 3842/4885
US-20090259036-A1 EXTRACTION OF LESS POLAR IMPURITIES FROM SUCRALOSE CONTAINING AQUEOUS FEED STREAMS SI, SORD, SUCNR1 RET 1923/4885GRK5 4465/4885TYRO3 2560/4885
US-20100081803-A1 EFFECT OF CARBOHYDRATE CONCENTRATION ON SUCRALOSE EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY SI, SORD, SLC2A8 RET 2284/4885GRK5 4608/4885TYRO3 3933/4885
US-20090281295-A1 CRYSTALLIZATION OF SUCRALOSE FROM SUCRALOSE-CONTAINING FEED STREAMS SI, SORD, GYS2 RET 2509/4885GRK5 3776/4885TYRO3 4007/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.