Cytidine

Cytidine

SCHEMBL4468985

Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H]2O)c(=O)n1.O=c1[nH]c(=O)n([C@H]2C[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)cc1F

nearest known ligand 0.65

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

POLA1POLA2POLD1POLD2POLD3POLD4POLEPOLE2POLE3PRIM1PRIM2

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Cytidine. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.65
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.65
THRB P10828 1/20 0.62
MTOR P42345 1/20 0.62
MDM2 Q00987 1/20 0.62
NCOA1 Q15788 1/20 0.62
NCOA3 Q9Y6Q9 1/20 0.62
PLA2G1B P04054 1/20 0.56
ATG4B Q9Y4P1 1/20 0.56
P2RY2 P41231 3/20 0.54
P2RY4 P51582 3/20 0.54
P2RY6 Q15077 2/20 0.54
ALOX12 P18054 1/20 0.50
ADRA1A P35348 1/20 0.50
TK1 P04183 1/20 0.50

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Doxribtimine SCHEMBL6518312 0.90 LMNA (0.62) LMNASMN1; SMN2THRBMTORMDM2
Doxribtimine SCHEMBL787714 0.90 LMNA (0.62) LMNASMN1; SMN2THRBMTORMDM2
Cytarabine SCHEMBL8980109 0.89 LMNA (0.51) LMNASMN1; SMN2THRBMTORMDM2
Cytidine SCHEMBL574822 0.87 LMNA (0.67) LMNATHRBMTORMDM2NCOA1
5-Fluorouridine SCHEMBL4390966 0.87 LMNA (0.83) LMNASMN1; SMN2P2RY6ALOX12ADRA1A
5-Fluorouridine SCHEMBL4390962 0.87 LMNA (0.83) LMNASMN1; SMN2P2RY6ALOX12ADRA1A
Cytidine SCHEMBL7196447 0.87 LMNA (0.79) LMNASMN1; SMN2THRBMTORMDM2
Doxribtimine SCHEMBL29124320 0.86 P2RY2 (0.60) LMNASMN1; SMN2THRBMTORMDM2
Floxuridine SCHEMBL15375760 0.86 LMNA (0.72) LMNASMN1; SMN2PLA2G1BATG4BP2RY2
Uridine SCHEMBL18249683 0.85 P2RY2 (0.71) LMNATHRBMTORMDM2NCOA1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7585855-B2 Bengamides with a substituted caprolactam cycle, method for the preparation thereof, compositions containing them and use thereof AVENTIS PHARMA SA (FR) 2009-09-08 US disclosed
US-20080318928-A1 BENGAMIDES WITH A SUBSTITUTED CAPROLACTAM CYCLE, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING THEM AND USE THEREOF AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. (FR) 2008-12-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080318928-A1 BENGAMIDES WITH A SUBSTITUTED CAPROLACTAM CYCLE, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING THEM AND USE THEREOF CDK4, CCNI, CCNT2 LMNA 274/4885SMN1; SMN2 3147/4885THRB 3795/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.