SCHEMBL460341

SCHEMBL460341

CCn1cnc2c1c(=O)n(CCl)c(=O)n2C

nearest known ligand 0.63

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ ADORA2B P29275 7/20 0.63
▸ PDE4A P27815 3/20 0.63
▸ ADORA2A P29274 2/20 0.63
▸ PDE4B Q07343 2/20 0.63
▸ PDE4C Q08493 2/20 0.63
▸ PDE4D Q08499 2/20 0.63
▸ MAPT P10636 2/20 0.58
▸ POLB P06746 1/20 0.54
▸ HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.54
▸ TRPA1 O75762 2/20 0.53
▸ LMNA P02545 2/20 0.52
▸ ESR1 P03372 1/20 0.52
▸ CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.52
▸ NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.52
▸ ACHE P22303 1/20 0.52
▸ BLM P54132 1/20 0.52
▸ PMP22 Q01453 1/20 0.52

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL22471417 0.89 ADORA2B (0.68) ADORA2BPDE4AADORA2APDE4BPDE4C
SCHEMBL2119480 0.85 ADORA2B (0.63) ADORA2BPDE4AADORA2APDE4BPDE4C
SCHEMBL5463429 0.83 ADORA2B (0.68) ADORA2BPDE4AADORA2APDE4BPDE4C
SCHEMBL27552726 0.83 ADORA2B (0.60) ADORA2BPDE4AADORA2APDE4BPDE4C
SCHEMBL516014 0.83 ADORA2B (0.72) ADORA2BPDE4AADORA2APDE4BPDE4C
SCHEMBL8659000 0.82 ADORA2B (0.59) ADORA2BPDE4AADORA2APDE4BPDE4C
SCHEMBL25778327 0.81 PDE4A (0.71) ADORA2BPDE4AADORA2APDE4BPDE4C
SCHEMBL515570 0.80 PDE4A (0.83) ADORA2BPDE4AADORA2APDE4BPDE4C
SCHEMBL9293292 0.80 PDE4A (0.62) ADORA2BPDE4AADORA2APDE4BPDE4C
SCHEMBL14985852 0.79 LMNA (0.58) ADORA2BPDE4AADORA2APDE4BPDE4C

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8470805-B2 Processes for preparing piperazinium salts of KMUP and use thereof KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2013-06-25 — — US disclosed
WO-2012031445-A1 PROCESSES FOR PREPARING PIPERAZINIUM SALTS OF KMUP AND USE THEREOF KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (CN) 2012-03-15 — — WO disclosed
US-20110136767-A1 PROCESSES FOR PREPARING PIPERAZINIUM SALTS OF KMUP AND USE THEREOF KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2011-06-09 — — US disclosed
US-20110118464-A1 HALOGENATED XANTHINE DERIVATIVES AND PRECURSORS THEREOF FOR ANTI-CANCER AND ANTI-METASTASIS ACTIVITY AND PREPARING METHOD THEREOF KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY 2011-05-19 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110136767-A1 PROCESSES FOR PREPARING PIPERAZINIUM SALTS OF KMUP AND USE THEREOF U2SURP, RRP15, KYNU ADORA2B 1268/4885PDE4A 550/4885ADORA2A 969/4885
US-20110118464-A1 HALOGENATED XANTHINE DERIVATIVES AND PRECURSORS THEREOF FOR ANTI-CANCER AND ANTI-METASTASIS ACTIVITY AND PREPARING METHOD THEREOF TK1, XDH, KYAT1 ADORA2B 2865/4885PDE4A 920/4885ADORA2A 1622/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback