Hydrochloric Acid

Hydrochloric Acid

SCHEMBL5561280

CCOC(C)[n+]1cccc(Nc2ccc(CC)c(O)c2)c1.[Cl-]

nearest known ligand 0.33

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

ACHEBDKRB2CHRM1CHRM2CHRM3CHRNA1CHRNB1CHRNDCHRNECHRNGGUCY1A1GUCY1A2GUCY1B1GUCY1B2NAMPTPTAFRSLC10A2SLC6A2SLC6A3TACR1dacAdacBdacCftsImrcAmrcBmrdA

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Hydrochloric Acid. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 8)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ KDR P35968 1/20 0.32
▸ MTNR1B P49286 2/20 0.32
▸ CDC25B P30305 1/20 0.31
▸ LMNA P02545 1/20 0.31
▸ MAPT P10636 1/20 0.31
▸ MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.31
▸ HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.31
▸ PTGES O14684 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6130233 0.71 TUBB4A (0.44) LMNAMAPTMAPK1HSD17B10
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL5565982 0.65 ALDH1A1 (0.40) KDRLMNAMAPT
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6130242 0.64 ARG1 (0.39) MAPTMAPK1HSD17B10
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL28596229 0.64 LMNA (0.36) LMNAMAPTMAPK1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6130235 0.64 ARG1 (0.41) MAPTMAPK1HSD17B10
SCHEMBL6462907 0.62 LMNA (0.38) LMNA
SCHEMBL15934313 0.61 ALDH1A1 (0.41) KDRMAPTHSD17B10
SCHEMBL3034620 0.61 PLA2G7 (0.50) —
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL5565999 0.60 KDR (0.41) KDR
SCHEMBL24703392 0.60 POLB (0.65) MTNR1BLMNAMAPTMAPK1HSD17B10

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7229479-B2 Method of coloring porous material CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS CORPORATION (US) 2007-06-12 — — US disclosed
US-20060162095-A1 Method of colouring porous material CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS CORP. 2006-07-27 — — US disclosed
EP-1534226-A1 METHOD OF COLOURING POROUS MATERIAL Ciba SC Holding AG (CH) 2005-06-01 — — EP disclosed
WO-2004019897-A1 METHOD OF COLOURING POROUS MATERIAL CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS HOLDING INC. (CH) 2004-03-11 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060162095-A1 Method of colouring porous material ACR, HLA-C, TYR KDR 4077/4885MTNR1B 4231/4885CDC25B 1640/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback