Potassium Ion

Potassium Ion

SCHEMBL6063243

CCC(C=CC(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)O.[K+]

nearest known ligand 0.33

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

AGTR1DHFRGABBR1GABBR2GABRA1GABRA2GABRA3GABRA4GABRA5GABRA6GABRB1GABRB2GABRB3GABRDGABREGABRG1GABRG2GABRG3GABRPGABRQGARTNR3C2PBP2XPTGS1PTGS2VKORC1blablaT-3blaT-4blaT-5blaT-6dacAdacBdacCfolAftsImrcAmrcBmrdApbp1apbp1bpbp2apbp2bpbp3polthyA

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Potassium Ion. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.32
CA9 Q16790 1/20 0.32
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.32
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.32
APEX1 P27695 1/20 0.32
BBOX1 O75936 1/20 0.31
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.30
NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.30
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Potassium Ion SCHEMBL6063235 1.00 CA1 (0.32) CA1CA9TSHRALOX15APEX1
SCHEMBL2272261 0.80 GABRP (0.40) TSHR
SCHEMBL1132712 0.80 GABRP (0.40) TSHR
Potassium Ion SCHEMBL1023573 0.73 CYP3A4 (0.30) TSHRCYP3A4NFKB1NPSR1
Potassium Ion SCHEMBL6063598 0.73 CYP3A4 (0.30) TSHRCYP3A4NFKB1NPSR1
SCHEMBL27506502 0.73
SCHEMBL9345636 0.72 CYP3A4 (0.32) TSHRCYP3A4NFKB1NPSR1
SCHEMBL11831547 0.69 BBOX1 (0.34) TSHRALOX15APEX1BBOX1
SCHEMBL8973864 0.68
SCHEMBL16445575 0.68

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11634666-B2 Methods for spore removal comprising a polysorbate surfactant and cationic antimicrobial mixture 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2023-04-25 US disclosed
US-20180369118-A1 METHODS FOR SPORE REMOVAL 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2018-12-27 US disclosed
US-20180362895-A1 METHODS FOR SPORE REMOVAL 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2018-12-20 US disclosed
WO-2017112565-A1 METHODS FOR SPORE REMOVAL 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2017-06-29 WO disclosed
WO-2017112567-A1 METHODS FOR SPORE REMOVAL 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2017-06-29 WO disclosed
US-7012048-B2 Composition and method for treating hair containing a cationic ampholytic polymer and an anionic benefit agent NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL INVESTMENT HOLDING CORPORATION (US) 2006-03-14 US disclosed
US-20040224862-A1 Composition and method for treating hair containing a cationic ampholytic polymer and an anionic benefit agent AKZO NOBEL N.V. (NL) 2004-11-11 US disclosed
EP-1447075-A2 Composition and method for treating hair containing a cationic ampholytic polymer and an anionic benefit agent National Starch and Chemical Investment Holding Corporation (US) 2004-08-18 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040224862-A1 Composition and method for treating hair containing a cationic ampholytic polymer and an anionic benefit agent KRT18, PSAP, AREG CA1 79/4885CA9 98/4885TSHR 4532/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.