SCHEMBL6073

SCHEMBL6073

CCCOc1ccc(CCCC(=O)NS(C)(=O)=O)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.56

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.56
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.56
LTA4H P09960 1/20 0.54
MMP1 P03956 1/20 0.48
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.48
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.48
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.48
PDE4A P27815 1/20 0.48
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.48
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.48
HDAC10 Q969S8 1/20 0.48
HDAC6 Q9UBN7 1/20 0.48
ACACB O00763 1/20 0.47
SLC5A1 P13866 1/20 0.47
SLC5A2 P31639 1/20 0.47
CYP4F2 P78329 1/20 0.47
CYP4A11 Q02928 1/20 0.47
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.46
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.46
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL11899994 0.88 LTA4H (0.61) LMNALTA4HALDH1A1FFAR1
SCHEMBL12049 0.85 LTA4H (0.50) L3MBTL1LMNALTA4HSMN1; SMN2ACACB
SCHEMBL6158 0.81 LTA4H (0.46) LTA4HMMP1SMN1; SMN2CYP4F2CYP4A11
SCHEMBL5797 0.80 EPHX2 (0.53) LTA4HCYP4F2CYP4A11FFAR1
SCHEMBL11593 0.80 LTA4H (0.45) L3MBTL1LTA4HCYP1A2CYP2D6ACACB
SCHEMBL28594598 0.79 L3MBTL1 (0.63) L3MBTL1LMNALTA4HKDM4ECYP1A2
SCHEMBL5811 0.78 MMP2 (0.54) LTA4HMMP1SMN1; SMN2CYP4F2CYP4A11
SCHEMBL6212 0.78 MAOB (0.54) MEN1KMT2AFFAR1
SCHEMBL452538 0.78 S1PR1 (0.70) LTA4HMEN1KMT2AFFAR1
SCHEMBL11898793 0.77 CYP4F2 (0.51) LMNALTA4HSMN1; SMN2ACACBCYP4F2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20140364398-A1 C-Linked Hydroxamic Acid Derivatives Useful As Antibacterial Agents PFIZER INC. (US) 2014-12-11 US disclosed
US-8853258-B2 C-linked hydroxamic acid derivatives useful as antibacterial agents PFIZER INC. (US) 2014-10-07 US disclosed
EP-2488489-A2 C-LINKED HYDROXAMIC ACID DERIVATIVES USEFUL AS ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTS Pfizer Inc. (US) 2012-08-22 EP disclosed
US-20120202777-A1 C-Linked Hydroxamic Acid Derivatives Useful As Antibacterial Agents BROWN MATTHEW FRANK (US) 2012-08-09 US disclosed
WO-2011045703-A2 C-LINKED HYDROXAMIC ACID DERIVATIVES USEFUL AS ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTS PFIZER INC. (US) 2011-04-21 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120202777-A1 C-Linked Hydroxamic Acid Derivatives Useful As Antibacterial Agents HAX1, LPXN, AGXT L3MBTL1 128/4885LMNA 143/4885LTA4H 115/4885
US-20140364398-A1 C-Linked Hydroxamic Acid Derivatives Useful As Antibacterial Agents LCT, AGXT, PRXL2A L3MBTL1 460/4885LMNA 469/4885LTA4H 352/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.