SCHEMBL887465

SCHEMBL887465

CCC(C)COP(C)(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.36

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SAT1 P21673 1/20 0.36
LAP3 P28838 1/20 0.34
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.34
MMP1 P03956 2/20 0.33
MMP2 P08253 2/20 0.33
MMP3 P08254 1/20 0.33
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.31
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.31
PPARD Q03181 1/20 0.31
GABBR2 O75899 1/20 0.31
GABBR1 Q9UBS5 1/20 0.31
CA2 P00918 2/20 0.30
LPAR3 Q9UBY5 3/20 0.30
LPAR1 Q92633 2/20 0.30
LPAR2 Q9HBW0 2/20 0.30
PGK1 P00558 1/20 0.30
PGK2 P07205 1/20 0.30
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.30
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.30
MMP8 P22894 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2474832 0.84 LAP3 (0.36) LAP3MAPTMMP1MMP2MMP3
SCHEMBL13804308 0.84 PGK1 (0.45) LPAR3LPAR1LPAR2PGK1PGK2
SCHEMBL2471542 0.84 PGK1 (0.45) LPAR3LPAR1LPAR2PGK1PGK2
SCHEMBL28452952 0.81 CYP3A4 (0.33) MAPTCYP3A4L3MBTL1
SCHEMBL28389815 0.80 LAP3 (0.33) LAP3MAPTMMP1MMP2MMP3
SCHEMBL12146353 0.80 LAP3 (0.39) LAP3MAPTMMP1MMP2MMP3
SCHEMBL12342799 0.78 PPARD (0.38) LAP3MAPTMMP1MMP2MMP3
SCHEMBL15783767 0.78 PLA2G2A (0.43) LAP3MAPTMMP1MMP2MMP3
SCHEMBL4761816 0.78
SCHEMBL6858014 0.78 CYP3A4 (0.48) MAPTCYP3A4L3MBTL1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8052992-B2 Lipid preparation including glycerophospholid esters with polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA); increased bioavailability of PUFA; use as pharmaceutical, nutraceutical e.g. neurodegenerative disorders ENZYMOTEC LTD. (IL) 2011-11-08 US disclosed
US-20090074857-A1 Glycerophospholipids for the improvement of cognitive functions ENZYMOTEC LTD. 2009-03-19 US disclosed
US-20080226757-A1 Use of a Ginkgo Complexes for the Enhancement of Cognitive Functions and the Alleviation of Mental Fatigue INDENA S.P.A. (IT) 2008-09-18 US disclosed
US-20070293449-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DELIVERY OF DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA NASTECH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY INC. (US) 2007-12-20 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080226757-A1 Use of a Ginkgo Complexes for the Enhancement of Cognitive Functions and the Alleviation of Mental Fatigue PHOSPHO1, PSEN1, PLCB3 SAT1 4563/4885LAP3 3397/4885MAPT 381/4885
US-20090074857-A1 Glycerophospholipids for the improvement of cognitive functions ELOVL6, PLA2G4C, PLA2G2A SAT1 1942/4885LAP3 265/4885MAPT 505/4885
US-20070293449-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DELIVERY OF DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA ADAR, POLRMT, MTREX SAT1 2735/4885LAP3 2203/4885MAPT 4150/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.