SCHEMBL3655409

SCHEMBL3655409

NC(=O)Nc1cc(Nc2nc(N)nc(Cl)n2)ccc1N=Nc1cc2c(S(=O)(=O)[O-])cc(S(=O)(=O)[O-])cc2cc1S(=O)(=O)[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+]

nearest known ligand 0.42

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

ABCC8ACEADORA1ADORA2AADORA2BADORA3ALDH5A1ALOX5ALOX5APATP4AATP4BBRAFCA1CA12CA2CA4CYSLTR1DHFRDPEP1EDNRAEDNRBESR2F10FDPSFGF1GABBR1GABBR2GABRA1GABRA2GABRA3GABRA4GABRA5GABRA6GABRB1GABRB2GABRB3GABRDGABREGABRG1GABRG2GABRG3GABRPGABRQGARTGNRHRGSC1HMGCRIMPDH1IMPDH2KCNJ11LY96NOD2NR3C1NS3NS4ANS5bP2RY1P2RY12P2RY2P2RY4P2RY6PBP2XPDE3APDE3BPDE4APDE4BPDE4CPDE4DPDK1PDK2PDK3PDK4PPARGPPATPTGIRPTGS1PTGS2RAF1RYR1RYR3SCN10ASCN11ASCN1ASCN2ASCN3ASCN4ASCN5ASCN7ASCN8ASCN9ASERPINC1SLC12A1SLC12A3SYKTHRATHRBTLR3TLR4TLR9TUBA1ATUBA1BTUBA1CTUBA3CTUBA3ETUBA4ATUBBTUBB1TUBB2ATUBB2BTUBB3TUBB4ATUBB4BTUBB6TUBB8TYMSVKORC1XDHblablaIMP-1blaOXA-33blaOXA-58blaT-3blaT-4blaT-5blaT-6dacAdacBdacCfolAfolPfolP1ftsIfusAgaggyrAgyrBmecAmrcAmrcBmrdApbp1apbp1bpbp2pbp2apbp2bpbp3pbp4pbpApbpBpbpCpbpFpolponBrplArplBrplCrplDrplErplFrplJrplKrplLrplMrplNrplOrplPrplQrplRrplSrplTrplUrplVrplWrplXrplYrpmArpmBrpmCrpmDrpmErpmFrpmGrpmHrpmIrpmJrpoArpoBrpoCrpoZrpsArpsBrpsCrpsDrpsErpsFrpsGrpsHrpsIrpsJrpsKrpsLrpsMrpsNrpsOrpsPrpsQrpsRrpsSrpsTrpsUykgMykgO

The experimentally established mechanism targets of None. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ P2RY4 known ✓ P51582 5/20 0.40
▸ THRB known ✓ P10828 1/20 0.40
▸ P2RY2 known ✓ P41231 6/20 0.39
▸ P2RY12 known ✓ Q9H244 6/20 0.39
▸ P2RY6 known ✓ Q15077 3/20 0.39
▸ P2RY1 known ✓ P47900 2/20 0.36
▸ CA12 known ✓ O43570 6/20 0.36
▸ CA1 known ✓ P00915 6/20 0.36
▸ CA2 known ✓ P00918 6/20 0.36
▸ CARM1 Q86X55 1/20 0.42
▸ PRMT1 Q99873 1/20 0.42
▸ MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.40
▸ USP2 O75604 1/20 0.40
▸ LMNA P02545 1/20 0.40
▸ TP53 P04637 1/20 0.40
▸ POLB P06746 1/20 0.40
▸ CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.40
▸ GAA P10253 1/20 0.40
▸ CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.40
▸ MAPT P10636 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL29575012 1.00 CARM1 (0.42) CARM1PRMT1P2RY4MEN1USP2
SCHEMBL29637596 0.88 FUT8 (0.46) CARM1PRMT1MEN1USP2THRB
SCHEMBL4167795 0.88 FUT8 (0.46) CARM1PRMT1MEN1USP2THRB
SCHEMBL3653222 0.88 FUT8 (0.46) CARM1PRMT1MEN1USP2THRB
SCHEMBL12954926 0.85 FUT8 (0.43) CARM1PRMT1MEN1USP2THRB
SCHEMBL29386110 0.83 P2RY12 (0.65) P2RY4MEN1USP2LMNATP53
SCHEMBL28606272 0.83 P2RY2 (0.40) CARM1PRMT1P2RY4MEN1USP2
SCHEMBL20314643 0.83 FUT8 (0.43) P2RY4MEN1USP2THRBAPEX1
SCHEMBL9270771 0.82 FUT8 (0.48) CARM1PRMT1P2RY4MEN1USP2
SCHEMBL9740928 0.82 FUT8 (0.48) CARM1PRMT1P2RY4MEN1USP2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8367823-B2 Colorants based N-halamines compositions and method of making and using BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (US) 2013-02-05 — — US disclosed
CN-101868506-A Colorants based N-halamines compositions and method of making and using UNIV TEXAS 2010-10-20 — — CN disclosed
EP-2201069-A2 COLORANTS BASED N-HALAMINES COMPOSITIONS AND METHOD OF MAKING AND USING Board of Regents, The University of Texas System (US) 2010-06-30 — — EP disclosed
WO-2009039180-A2 COLORANTS BASED N-HALAMINES COMPOSITIONS AND METHOD OF MAKING AND USING BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (US) 2009-03-26 — — WO disclosed
US-20090074825-A1 COLORANTS BASED N-HALAMINES COMPOSITIONS AND METHOD OF MAKING AND USING BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (US) 2009-03-19 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090074825-A1 COLORANTS BASED N-HALAMINES COMPOSITIONS AND METHOD OF MAKING AND USING TYR, MPO, NISCH P2RY4 3991/4885THRB 3776/4885P2RY2 4371/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback