SCHEMBL5572448

SCHEMBL5572448

O=C(Nc1ccccc1)c1ccsn1

nearest known ligand 0.73

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
RAB9A P51151 5/20 0.73
NPC1 O15118 4/20 0.73
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.73
POLB P06746 2/20 0.58
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.53
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.51
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.51
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 4/20 0.50
NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.50
NFKB2 Q00653 1/20 0.50
RELA Q04206 1/20 0.50
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.50
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.49
HTT P42858 1/20 0.47
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.46
CNR1 P21554 1/20 0.46
KDR P35968 1/20 0.46
PTPN1 P18031 1/20 0.46
F2 P00734 1/20 0.45
PLAU P00749 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2859096 0.75 LMNA (0.73) RAB9ANPC1LMNAPOLBKMT2A
SCHEMBL22246649 0.75 NPC1 (0.61) RAB9ANPC1LMNAPOLBKMT2A
SCHEMBL15347911 0.73 POLB (1.00) RAB9ANPC1LMNAPOLBKMT2A
SCHEMBL30834279 0.73 RAB9A (0.73) RAB9ANPC1POLBKMT2AALDH1A1
SCHEMBL231897 0.72 KDR (0.78) RAB9ANPC1POLBKMT2AKDM4E
SCHEMBL6740987 0.72 ALDH1A1 (0.50) RAB9ANPC1LMNAKMT2AALDH1A1
SCHEMBL22725202 0.71 POLB (0.53) RAB9ANPC1LMNAPOLBKMT2A
SCHEMBL20273850 0.71 POLB (0.53) RAB9ANPC1LMNAPOLBKMT2A
SCHEMBL11204841 0.71 SMN1; SMN2 (0.47) RAB9ANPC1LMNAKMT2AALDH1A1
SCHEMBL9896549 0.70 POLB (0.61) RAB9ANPC1POLBKMT2AALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20230240299-A1 COMPOSITION FOR CONTROLLING SUGAR BEET CERCOSPORA LEAF SPOT DISEASE BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2023-08-03 US disclosed
US-20070060551-A1 Methods of using isothiazole derivatives to treat cancer or inflammation QLT, INC. (CA) 2007-03-15 US disclosed
EP-1521577-A1 METHODS OF USING ISOTHIAZOLE DERIVATIVES TO TREAT CANCER OR INFLAMMATION QLT, Inc. (CA) 2005-04-13 EP disclosed
WO-2003105843-A1 METHODS OF USING ISOTHIAZOLE DERIVATIVES TO TREAT CANCER OR INFLAMMATION KINETEK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (CA) 2003-12-24 WO disclosed
EP-0073973-A1 Thiazolyl and isothiazolyl-carboxylic-acid anilides, process for their preparation and their utilization as fungicides BASF Aktiengesellschaft (DE) 1983-03-16 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070060551-A1 Methods of using isothiazole derivatives to treat cancer or inflammation CASP3, LITAF, MGST3 RAB9A 4306/4885NPC1 2350/4885LMNA 4700/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.