SCHEMBL11899992

SCHEMBL11899992

CS(=O)(=O)C(CCc1ccc(OCCOc2ccccc2)cc1)C(N)=O

nearest known ligand 0.50

Predicted protein targets (top 13)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PARP10 Q53GL7 1/20 0.48
PPARG P37231 2/20 0.45
PPARD Q03181 1/20 0.45
PPARA Q07869 1/20 0.45
FFAR1 O14842 3/20 0.45
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.44
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.44
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.44
CA7 P43166 1/20 0.44
CA9 Q16790 1/20 0.44
PKM P14618 1/20 0.43
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.43
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6072 0.88 LMNA (0.52) PPARGPPARACA12CA1CA2
SCHEMBL12048 0.84 ACACB (0.47) PPARGPPARDPPARAFFAR1CA12
SCHEMBL10157 0.82 MMP12 (0.50) FFAR1
SCHEMBL6011 0.81 CA12 (0.46) CA12CA1CA2CA7CA9
SCHEMBL6157 0.80 PARP10 (0.43) PARP10FFAR1CA12CA1CA2
SCHEMBL5796 0.79 MAOB (0.46) PARP10FFAR1
SCHEMBL11898792 0.78 ADAMTS4 (0.48) MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL10688 0.78 FFAR1 (0.60) FFAR1
SCHEMBL5810 0.77 MMP1 (0.48) PARP10FFAR1
SCHEMBL5635 0.77 MMP2 (0.51) FFAR1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20140364398-A1 C-Linked Hydroxamic Acid Derivatives Useful As Antibacterial Agents PFIZER INC. (US) 2014-12-11 US disclosed
US-8853258-B2 C-linked hydroxamic acid derivatives useful as antibacterial agents PFIZER INC. (US) 2014-10-07 US disclosed
US-20120202777-A1 C-Linked Hydroxamic Acid Derivatives Useful As Antibacterial Agents BROWN MATTHEW FRANK (US) 2012-08-09 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120202777-A1 C-Linked Hydroxamic Acid Derivatives Useful As Antibacterial Agents HAX1, LPXN, AGXT PARP10 2000/4885PPARG 2897/4885PPARD 2294/4885
US-20140364398-A1 C-Linked Hydroxamic Acid Derivatives Useful As Antibacterial Agents LCT, AGXT, PRXL2A PARP10 1873/4885PPARG 2968/4885PPARD 2486/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.